Unacademy’s Profitability Dilemma: Sustaining Growth in EdTech

1. Introduction

Unacademy rapidly became one of India’s most recognizable edtech brands, scaling through aggressive content expansion, educator onboarding, and deep discounting.
But as funding slowed and competition intensified, profitability became the core challenge.

The key question:
How can Unacademy sustain growth while achieving positive unit economics?


2. The Core Problem

Unacademy faced the classic edtech dilemma:

  • High cost of acquiring learners
  • Heavy spending on educator payouts
  • Low conversion from free to paid
  • High churn after exam cycles
  • Dependence on seasonal spikes (UPSC, JEE, CAT)
  • Rising content production costs

Growth was solid — but profitability was not.


3. Why This Problem Emerged

A. Profitability Framework Review

Revenue Drivers

  • Subscription revenue (Plus, Iconic)
  • Ad revenue (minor)
  • Test series + special classes

Issues:

  • Low willingness to pay outside top exams
  • High churn after exam attempt
  • Free content cannibalizing paid content

Cost Drivers

  • Educator payouts (fixed + incentives)
  • Content creation & production
  • Marketing (discounts, influencers)
  • Technology & live-stream infra
  • Offline expansion costs

Insight: Customer acquisition + educator payouts = majority of costs.


B. Growth Levers Review

Unacademy relied heavily on two levers:

  1. New category expansion (Banking, CAT, State PSCs, K-12)
  2. Educator flywheel (more educators → more content → more students)

Growth was happening, but profitability per category varied drastically.


C. Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) Analysis

LTV Components

  • Subscription length (3–12 months)
  • Retention after 1st attempt
  • Average revenue per user (ARPU)

Findings:

  • Exam prep is cyclical → retention drops sharply after exams
  • High-competition categories have low LTV
  • Educator loyalty programs increased cost per student

Conclusion:
Unacademy’s LTV was too low to justify its high CAC.


4. Key Insights

Insight 1: Not all exam categories are profitable

UPSC, CAT, and GATE have high-paying, sticky students.
But K-12, state exams, and low-fee categories dilute margins.


Insight 2: Educator cost inflation is a major margin killer

Top educators receive high fixed payouts + bonuses → poor scalability.


Insight 3: Free content pulls traffic but reduces paid conversion

A delicate balance is needed between free and paid content.


Insight 4: Offline expansion increases CAC but improves LTV

Offline + online hybrid is higher-cost but higher-retention.


5. Recommendations

Recommendation 1: Prioritize High-LTV Categories

Double down on:

  • CAT
  • GATE
  • UPSC
  • JEE/NEET

Reduce investment in:

  • K-12
  • Low-ticket state exams
  • Experimental categories

Recommendation 2: Reduce Educator Cost via Variable Structures

  • Lower fixed payouts
  • Higher performance-based incentives
  • Reduce dependency on star educators
  • Build in-house academic teams for content-heavy courses

This increases margin predictability.


Recommendation 3: Optimize Free vs Paid Content Balance

  • Keep short-form free content
  • Lock high-value lectures behind paywall
  • Focus on test series upsell
  • Leverage YouTube for top-of-funnel only

Higher conversion = higher profitability.


Recommendation 4: Build a Sustainable Hybrid Model

Offline + online centers in:

  • Delhi
  • Bangalore
  • Kota

Benefits:

  • Higher retention
  • Higher LTV
  • Up to 2–3× ARPU

Recommendation 5: Improve Retention & LTV

  • Progress dashboards
  • Personalized revision plans
  • Doubt-solving chat at scale
  • AI-driven personalized schedules
  • Renewal discounts targeted at high-churn groups

6. Expected Impact

Short-term (6–12 months):

  • 10–15% reduction in educator payout costs
  • 8–12% increase in paid conversions
  • Lower CAC via focused categories

Medium-term (1–2 years):

  • Higher LTV from hybrid centers
  • Stronger retention from structured learning pathways

Long-term (3–5 years):

  • Sustainable profitability with a defensible moat
  • Balanced offline + online brand presence
  • Reduced dependency on heavy marketing

7. Summary

Unacademy’s challenge is fundamentally one of unit economics, not growth.
By prioritizing profitable segments, rebalancing educator payouts, optimizing conversion, and building a hybrid model, Unacademy can move toward predictable and sustainable profitability.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top